New Report on Rising Fuel Price Consumer Impact
Check It Out
<-Back

Capturing Real-Time Sports Betting Behaviours Through WhatsApp Diaries

How The Research Agency (TRA) used AI-moderated diary studies to uncover in-the-moment betting decisions across Australia and New Zealand.

The Research Agency (TRA) — Yazi Case Study
YAZI CASE STUDY

How The Research Agency (TRA) used AI-moderated diary studies to uncover in-the-moment betting decisions across Australia and New Zealand.

44
Active bettors
across 2 markets
14
Day longitudinal
diary study
3
Campaign waves
with AI interviews
5+
Media types
captured per participant
Client
The Research Agency (TRA)
Industry
Qualitative Research
Markets
Australia & New Zealand
Duration
March – May 2025

The Brief

The Research Agency (TRA), a leading qualitative research firm based in Auckland and Sydney, needed to understand the real drivers behind sports betting behaviour. Their client wanted more than survey data — they wanted to see what actually happens in the moments when someone places a bet.

Traditional approaches — retrospective interviews, online surveys, focus groups — would only capture what participants remembered and were willing to share days or weeks later. The behaviours TRA needed to study are fleeting, emotional, and deeply contextual: a bet placed in a pub during a live game feels very different from one placed alone on a couch.

TRA needed a method that could follow participants through their natural betting routines over multiple weeks, capturing decisions as they happened — the environment, the emotion, the trigger, and the outcome.

The Challenge

Sports betting is a behaviour that resists traditional research methods. The decisions are fast, emotional, and heavily influenced by context that disappears the moment it passes.

Recall Bias

Asking bettors to describe their decisions after the fact produces rationalised narratives, not authentic accounts. The emotional context — the adrenaline, the social pressure, the impulse — is lost.

Context Is Everything

Where someone bets, who they're with, what they're watching, and what promotions they've seen all shape the decision. None of this is captured by a survey form completed at a desk.

Behaviour Over Time

Betting isn't a single event — it's a pattern shaped by wins, losses, moods, and routines across days and weeks. A one-off interview captures a snapshot, not the full picture.

Cross-Market Complexity

Running identical methodology across New Zealand and Australia — with different betting cultures, platforms, and regulations — required a flexible, scalable approach.

The core question: How do you capture authentic, in-the-moment betting behaviour — the trigger, the environment, the emotion — without disrupting the behaviour itself?

The Approach

Yazi designed a multi-day digital diary study delivered entirely through WhatsApp, combining timed broadcast check-ins with adaptive AI-moderated conversations. The study ran in two phases: a pilot in New Zealand (18 participants) followed by the main study in Australia (26 participants).

Study Structure

Three campaign waves timed to intercept participants during peak betting windows — not when it was convenient for the research team, but when bets were actually being placed.

NZ PILOT18 participantsMethodology validationWAVE 1Friday PM broadcastsWeekend betting setupWAVE 2Saturday AM check-insPre-game ritualsWAVE 3Live event momentsIn-play decisionsAU MAIN26 participantsFull-scale rollout
Text responsesVoice notesScreenshotsTimed broadcastsAI-moderated interviewsAdaptive follow-ups
How it worked: Timed broadcasts landed at moments when betting behaviour was most likely — Friday afternoons, Saturday mornings, during live events. Yazi's AI interviewer conducted adaptive follow-up conversations based on each participant's responses, probing deeper on triggers, stakes, context, and social influences.

The participant experience

Participants received timed prompts via WhatsApp during peak betting windows, then engaged in AI-moderated conversations — sharing text responses and voice notes capturing their in-the-moment decisions.

What made this different

Natural Engagement

  • WhatsApp is where participants already spend their time — no app to download, no portal to navigate
  • Several participants voluntarily extended conversations, sharing more than asked
  • Conversational format encouraged depth that structured surveys cannot achieve

Temporal Precision

  • Broadcasts timed to actual betting windows, not researcher convenience
  • Friday PM prompts caught weekend anticipation and planning
  • Live event messages captured the adrenaline of in-play decisions

Adaptive AI Depth

  • AI interviewer personalised follow-ups to each participant's betting context
  • Dynamic probing on triggers, emotions, social influences, and outcomes
  • Maintained consistency across 44 participants while allowing individual depth

Rich Contextual Capture

  • Voice notes with ambient noise providing context text alone never could
  • Screenshots of betting apps, odds, and promotional messages
  • In-the-moment descriptions of environments, social settings, and emotional states

Results

Engagement That Sustained

Across the 14-day study, participants remained actively engaged — responding to timed broadcasts and continuing AI-moderated depth conversations across all three waves. The conversational WhatsApp format kept drop-off low and data quality high.

Broadcast engagement funnel
44DELIVERED100%41RESPONDED93%38COMPLETED86%▼ 7%▼ 7%

Qualitative Depth at Scale

The AI interviewer adapted its questioning based on each participant's responses — probing deeper on betting routines, triggers, and the role of different platforms. Participants engaged naturally, sharing voice notes and detailed text responses that revealed patterns traditional surveys would miss.

Rich Data Collection

  • 5+ media types captured per participant: text, voice notes, screenshots, video, and app captures
  • Voice notes captured ambient sound, emotion, and real-time commentary during live events
  • Several participants voluntarily extended conversations, sharing more than prompted

Cross-Market Consistency

  • Same methodology deployed across NZ and AU from a single platform
  • NZ pilot allowed TRA to refine the approach before Australian rollout
  • AI interviewer maintained consistency while adapting to individual betting contexts

Inside the Yazi platform

TRA received a comprehensive, analysis-ready data package — individual transcripts, structured exports, and rich media organised by participant and wave. The platform's built-in views made it easy to explore patterns directly.

Table DataGraph DataMedia LibraryAgent Takeover32 items
0:28
User 7a3f91c2
Voice Note
0:41
User 3e8b44d1
Voice Note
0:15
User c91f2e07
Voice Note
0:52
User 5d0aa8f3
Voice Note
0:36
User 7a3f91c2
Voice Note
0:19
User b4e29c18
Voice Note
1:04
User 3e8b44d1
Voice Note
0:22
User c91f2e07
Voice Note
Interview TranscriptsTable DataGraph DataExecutive Summary44 Participants
User 7a3f91c2
User 3e8b44d1
User c91f2e07
User 5d0aa8f3
User b4e29c18
User 8f1c3d92
User a2d67e4b
User 4bc91f03
Wave 1 · Friday PM
Have you placed any bets today or are you planning to this weekend?
Response
Yeah I've got a multi on the NRL tonight. Put it on at lunch when I saw the odds shift.
Follow-up
What prompted you to place it at lunch specifically? Was there something that triggered it?
Response
Please send a voice note with your answer.
Transcript
Got a push notification from the app saying the odds had changed on the Panthers game. I was already thinking about it so that kind of tipped me over. The boys were texting about it too so I just went for it.
Participant JourneyTable DataTimeline: User 7a3f91c2
Wave 1 · Friday 4:30pm
Have you placed any bets today or are you planning to this weekend?
Yeah I've got a multi on the NRL tonight. Put it on at lunch.
Wave 1 · Friday 4:42pm
What prompted you to place it at lunch? Was there something that triggered it?
Voice note · 0:28
Wave 2 · Saturday 9:15am
Good morning! Any bets on your mind for today's games?
Looking at the rugby. Might do a same-game multi if the line moves.
Wave 3 · Saturday 7:45pm
The game is on! Have you placed anything in-play?
Voice note · 0:41
Wave 3 · Sunday follow-up
How did last night's bets go? How are you feeling about it today?

Traditional Methods vs. This Approach

Traditional QualYazi Diary Study
TimingRetrospective recall, days or weeks laterIn-the-moment capture during live events
ContextDescribed verbally from memoryVoice notes and descriptions of the actual environment
DepthFixed question sets, one-size-fits-allAI-adapted follow-ups based on individual responses
MediaText onlyText, voice, screenshots, video
DurationSingle session or interview14-day longitudinal study across multiple touchpoints
ScaleSeparate field teams per marketSame platform across NZ and AU, centrally managed

Data Delivery & Analysis

TRA received a comprehensive, analysis-ready data package designed to integrate with their existing qualitative workflows.

Transcripts

  • Individual participant conversation files (.txt)
  • Complete interaction histories per participant
  • Voice note transcriptions included inline
  • TXT files formatted for import into CoLoop

Structured Data

  • Excel exports organised by day and campaign wave
  • Question-answer mapping across all touchpoints
  • Cross-wave comparison and trend tracking

Rich Media

  • Organised Google Drive folders by participant
  • Screenshots and voice note audio files
  • Media tagged by day and context

Built-in Analysis

  • Graph data views with response breakdowns
  • Multiple-choice analysis across participants
  • Cross-wave comparison and trend tracking

Impact

For the end client

Authentic, in-the-moment insights into betting behaviour that retrospective methods simply cannot produce. Evidence of the environments, triggers, and emotional states that drive betting decisions — giving the end client rich, contextual data to inform product and messaging strategy.

For the research agency

A methodology that delivered ethnographic depth at diary-study scale, across two markets, without proportional increase in field team or operational overhead. The NZ pilot allowed TRA to refine the approach before the Australian rollout — a built-in quality control loop that traditional methods rarely afford.

"

We needed to capture what happens in the moment someone places a bet, not what they remember a week later. The AI interviewer picked up on the small details like a mention of mates texting or a Friday afternoon ritual, and probed further in a way that felt natural. We ended up with the depth of a one-on-one interview across 44 participants, and voice notes where you could actually hear the pub in the background. That's ethnographic context you don't get from a survey.

Daniel, The Research Agency

Why This Matters for Qualitative Research

This project demonstrates that the traditional trade-off between depth and scale doesn't have to apply. By meeting participants on a platform they already use, at the moments that matter, through an AI interviewer that adapts to each individual, the study captured data that's not just more convenient to collect — it's fundamentally more authentic.

For research agencies working on complex behavioural studies, the combination of WhatsApp delivery, AI-moderated depth interviews, and rich media capture opens up territory that traditional diary studies and retrospective interviews cannot reach.

Interested in running a similar study?

Book a Demo →